use
(B) .S &Tueni: nG
Y S C
216
„VISTA ONE EsinoIo0
.no!
svoda sit no sasq of for saw I tart bootarsbrur I
rt motsetndwe gne bad I t TOJ ESIC WOTD SAJ of anoitouijaci
Bause 15 of Silenu Baw I .b¬jeng308 steds setvoo 9 di Jenis38 SAE”
JLO пt How en es nemazal .22 rit iw wird
Idissoq sttup al 31 .S
A liver as beat of tim (Joe) rol170 soltak art c
Jeft tear di jeni ed blow ofheucl T gniassa auc[Indi!
.\nJwcê! T901110 Join talc as y‡ub atd bados Ian bad not I kms!! I
- N‡ JUSET 08 #909 59 тy r'rajto¶ ‚TE 03 #totaz somajnaa 9:12
-
i baa ‚actfimal „II of siniog vinssic pathog of some retou
.STORESUSH91q «dt to ano at en sanj
i880. tvp si JI
J
10 jii £ T ebrow eaerit dont we tv and set ng im CIUL B
(bar Ivonų „two: vad Jell tis.il ngva agadzaq si ji .not finaН .1.
Tartow to nottasup art yf beesinos Jon "19w sbała Tigất Jant
Janiston Ja -aon babivorq avad of ton trigo to triquo JMENISVOð sit
abre Ist grid fit be softsoinua.:00 10 BIL89 **
^ Julia mayatima sdt tæt si fasoq oa la vowon Bi JI .E
nows 7: Jałą sɗ nama Buclisdil-non & mi batanqrəbai
muggia amos habiyong gvad of #ique dusunr,vöð sit jest el 1ettyI
15907901:00 9noytoys jadi bas,noitsolummoo tc
• di tintbulsat ·
1
+
ZATOR
4-
.voticq
E 200 Ing to gilts can invad,@Ilonuco i od 20 81dar Lelo fitonu
thepravou - no colloq aidi qniger Jon at
VEN CS JE... at th
Biyu of Vive la moqu ti 29ant b. „asijub sid latwo s
od fadil ut at di dent you do is blow 8. nabratab anl
eno at stich nonatal to vollen wir seit bna fasitsoq nem a
0.0 QAN OBIA Slow wit .Titik yasaon yen sneinigo do idw Juoda
27 10 ton Laan dit iw not lima) .T.. egrado of bebojni 197AN TAJITW SIJ
gons dan braidsvoë) voitto Jokijsku Jues... SÅ ɛs enitub ■in
Vino
ነ
only meant to suggest that if he had given more thought to the subject he would have made it his business to press the matter on the Government. They would point out that the writer made
the very same accusation of neglect against the whole Government,
including both Councils.
4.
It would not be possible for the Government to write
demanding an apology and threatening proceedings in case an apology were refused, because any action would have to be by
Hamilton himself and not by the Government.
Mr.
Hamilton
5. If, however, an action were commenced by Mr.
with Government backing, the fact of that backing would no doubt
become known, and the action would in the minds of the jury assume
the charater of an action by the Government. An adverse verdict
would therefore be a rebuff to the Government and I do not think
that the Government ought to embark in litigation unless it is
reasonably sure of probable success.
It is
6. The matter is clearly one of "public interest", and the
defendants would plead that it was only "fair comment".
true that the defence of fair comment on a matter of public
interest does not avail where the passage complained of containe
allegations of fact which are untrue, but, as I have suggested,
the defendants would probably deny that the letter contained
any allegations of neglect of duty by Mr. Hamilton in his office of the Assistant District Officer (South).
7. It might perhaps be suggested that a letter might be
sent to the papers denying on behalf of the Government any neglect of duty by Mr. Hamilton in his office, but I think that
the wisest and most dignified course for the Government to adopt
would be to ignore the letter.
8. I have not been able to obtain a copy of the China
Mail of yesterday, but I am told that the letter appeared in it
in
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.